How a Facebook spat exposes the weakness of the NetZero cult.

By TOM ED

Unless you’re an Eskimo or Russian, winter is a difficult period for most people. Even the sun is low, scraping the horizon from east to west with little resolve. In the UK winter is spent trussed up like a turkey in twenty layers of clothing while stuck on trains heated to slow cook temperatures. It’s easy to see why bears choose to sleep through it; or at least avoid trains. Winter confirms why it’s a colder planet, not a warmer one, that poses a greater risk to mankind.

Roughly twice as many people die of cold each year than heat (CDC National Centre for Health Statistics). Excellent story from Tom´s Substack .

This is rather awkward for the Net Zero hysterics singing the climate crisis hymn while sticking fingers in their ears at their increasingly erroneous modelling. The answer to the question ‘climate crisis or climate scam?’ depends generally upon whether the respondent has been a delegate at the WEF or COP, or not. 

Yes, COP, the Conference of the Parties (COP), the supreme decision-making body of the UNFCCC. Conference of the Parties sounds alarmingly like the Confederacy of dunces, which is probably why they’ve buried it beneath a word and letters scrapheap. Adding to that, it’s important to clarify that UNFCCC is the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

These unmemorable, incomprehensible abbreviations seem almost deliberate. The end of 2023 marked COP28, the 28^th well-publicised, yet murky, international back-patting jolly at which private jets belonging to people you’ve mostly never heard of, dictate how we should live. Their wishes are generally characterised by demanding that we don’t travel by air due to CO2 emissions. While they all jostled for room on the crowded airstrip in Dubai, I posted this on Facebook: 

I see it’s COP28 when all the alarmist globalist politicians fly in on private jets to meet behind closed doors with unelected billionaires and other self-appointed rulers over us, to discuss how we can pay more money to solve a man-made climate crisis that doesn’t exist.

COP28 had an early success by having the biggest carbon footprint in the history of the annual climate summit. This year’s soiree of private jets flying very high-level people to press earpieces importantly into their ears for a week coincided with the usual tie-in of mainstream media propaganda; this time the shrill ‘climate emergency season’ on Channel 4 that makes Eurovision seem an oasis of tranquillity and reason. It’s unclear if the expertise of a Grand Designs host, a cook and a shop window dresser, (AKA Kevin Mc (i) Cloud, Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and Mary Portas) will convince people to give up their way of life in favour of unreliable renewable energy sources and hot water bottles, but they have successfully echoed the old nursery rhyme Rub-a-dub-dub,
Three men in a tub,
And who do you think they be?
The butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker,
And all of them out to sea. 

These deep-thinking TV presenters, high on their abilities to read pre-written scripts to camera, spoke with the shallow authority of primary school teachers on the cost benefits of wind power, without for a moment asking their puppeteers what happens when it isn’t windy. It doesn’t matter how cheap magic beans are if they can’t grow a beanstalk. You can build over fertile farmland and desecrate beautiful horizons with endless wind farms, but you can’t create actual wind. 

Obviously, it’s not the debut for mainstream media serving as a megaphone for the climate crisis cult. Professor Norman Fenton, the risk and mathematics expert, also had his own run-in with the BBC on a documentary called Climate Change by Numbers. The producer of the programme even made clear before filming that the BBC no longer allowed any sceptical commentary on climate change as it deemed the ‘science was settled’.

Settled science would mean a planet balanced upon the backs of turtles, Phenology departments in hospitals, and that an Alzheimer’s drug looking promising in mice will positively impact humans, when most drugs that work in mice fail in mankind. Scientific research is a self-correcting process, the ignorance of which on the part of the BBC, C4 and these supranational bodies dictating to us, exposes the fake, pseudoscience being used by well-funded elites to promote their collectivist Net Zero agenda.

And it’s the contradiction in their agenda that provokes concern. The planet is warming – as it often does of its own accord, in this case as we emerge from the mini medieval ice age – which the alarmists claim will cause high levels of fatalities, yet successfully reaching Net Zero, in which no dependable energy is available will mean people dying from the cold, or at least dying of boredom waiting for electrified train lines to start working. The most glaring fact that undermines the calamity Janes is global annual deaths from natural disasters have been in decline since the 1920s.

Read the full story here.