Ed Miliband’s Most Brazenly Dishonest Claims Yet

A portrait of a man in a suit with a serious expression, standing in front of multiple wind turbines against a blue sky.

From The Daily Sceptic

By  Paul Homewood

A man wearing a hard hat and a high-visibility vest stands on a boat, smiling with offshore wind turbines visible in the background.

Ed Miliband’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has just announced the results of the new CfD auction, in what must go down as one of the most blatantly dishonest and arguably fraudulent Government press releases in recent years.

Press release announcing a record 8.4GW of offshore wind secured in Europe's biggest offshore wind auction to enhance Britain's energy independence.
Press release titled 'Record breaking auction for offshore wind secured to take back control of Britain's energy' from GOV.UK, detailing a record 8.4GW of offshore wind secured.

Britain has taken a monumental step towards ending the country’s reliance on volatile fossil fuels and lowering bills for good, by delivering a record-breaking offshore wind result in its latest renewables auction. 

The results deliver the biggest single procurement of offshore wind energy in British and  European history – confounding the global challenges facing the industry – a major vote of confidence in the UK’s new era of energy sovereignty and abundance. 

The Government inherited the fiasco of the previous government’s failed Auction Round 5, in which not a single offshore wind project was secured. The last auction round, AR6, got the industry back on its feet. Now this auction round, known as Contracts for Difference AR7, has secured a record capacity of 8.4 GW of offshore wind which will generate enough clean electricity to power the equivalent of 12 million homes. The ground-breaking result puts Britain firmly on track to achieve its clean power mission by 2030.

These results show offshore wind is cheaper to build and operate than new gas. In new figures published today using the LCOE industry metric, the cost of building and operating a new gas fired power station is £147 per megawatt hour. By contrast, the results for fixed offshore wind in today’s auction were £90.91 per megawatt hour on average – or £65.25 in the commonly used benchmark of 2012 prices – 40% cheaper than the cost of building and operating new gas.

This auction will unlock around £22 billion in private investment, supporting around 7,000 jobs, bringing growth and good jobs to all regions of the country – and particularly to the country’s industrial heartlands. Clean power is also essential to tackle the climate crisis, the greatest long-term threat the country faces. 

Below are the successful schemes:

Table displaying the results of Contracts for Difference Allocation Round 7, including project details such as location, applicant/developer, technology type, size in MW, strike prices, delivery year, and number of phases.
Table showing offshore wind project details, including project names, locations in England and Wales, companies involved, capacities, and project years.

Let’s start with the big lie:

Price for offshore wind agreed at 40% lower than the cost of building and operating a new gas power plant …

These results show offshore wind is cheaper to build and operate than new gas. In new figures published today using the LCOE industry metric, the cost of building and operating a new gas fired power station is £147 per megawatt hour. By contrast, the results for fixed offshore wind in today’s auction were £90.91 per megawatt hour on average – or £65.25 in the commonly used benchmark of 2012 prices – 40% cheaper than the cost of building and operating new gas.

There are the “new figures published today”:

Screenshot of a government report titled 'Electricity generation costs 2025', discussing cost estimates for electricity generation technologies.

The PDF analysis contains this table – I have highlighted the relevant column for Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) technology:

Bar graph displaying Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) estimates for various dispatchable technologies projected for commissioning in 2030. The chart includes categories such as Gas CCGT and CCHT, with different load factors and cost components like pre-development, construction, and carbon.

The data annexes confirm that the cost of new CCGT is estimate as £109 per MWh at 2024 prices – but this includes £41 per MWh for carbon tax, which is not a “cost” at all but a Government imposition. (It relates to the Emissions Trading Scheme, which could be torn up tomorrow, if the political will was there.)

The Government claim that offshore wind is 40% cheaper than gas implies a cost of gas power of about £150 per MWh. That is a fake claim, even if you allow for carbon costs.

The simple reality is that the real cost of new gas power would be £68 per MWh, around a quarter less than these new contracts for offshore wind. Of this, fuel costs account for £45 per MWh.

The second lie concerns the use of “2024 prices”, on which the “90.91 per MWh” price for offshore wind is based.

It has probably occurred to you that we are now in 2026! Since 2024, CPI has risen by 4.5%. As CfD strike prices are index linked, that “£90.91” has already risen to about £95 per MWh.

The wholesale price in Q4 2025 was £74.44 per MWh, according to the Government’s Low Carbon Contracts Company. Offshore wind will therefore be subsidised to the tune of £20 per MWh at these prices.

Line graph depicting historical data of CfD reference prices for offshore wind from 2017 to 2023, showing fluctuations in prices over time.
Line graph showing data trends from Q1 2024 to Q1 2026 with steady fluctuations.

Indeed, the Government admits as much, because the AR7 published results confirm that subsidies could top £1.9 billion a year by the time all the schemes are operational. These subsidies will have to be paid for 20 years, and index linked.

Table displaying estimated monetary budget impact for Pot 3 and Pot 4 from 2028/29 to 2032/33, with values outlined for each year.
Note: The “monetary Budget impact” is the expected subsidy payment i.e., strike price minus market price.

Then we come to the third big lie.

The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) is comparing new offshore wind with new CCGT. The true comparison however should be with existing CCGT, as we already have under-utilised CCGTs. It is generation from these that new wind power will replace.

As we have already paid for all of the fixed costs anyway, the only cost of producing additional electricity at CCGTs is the fuel cost, which as we have seen is around £45 per MWh. That means the cost of sourcing power from these new wind farms will be about £50 per MWh dearer than the gas power they are replacing.

We are tight on CCGT capacity and will need to construct new plants if older ones close as expected. But – crucially – we will have to do that anyway, whether we build new wind farms or not as gas will remain our back-up for intermittent renewables for the foreseeable future.

What Miliband wants is to spend tens of billions building offshore wind farms in addition to paying for that new gas capacity. It will not “lower bills for good”, as the presa release blurb states. It will raise bills yet further.

First published on Paul Homewood’s blog, Not a Lot of People Know That.


Discover more from Climate- Science.press

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.