The Problem with Wind Energy in the Northwest

A landscape featuring numerous wind turbines arranged in rows, set against a clear blue sky. The foreground includes sparse vegetation and desert-like terrain.

From The Cliff Mass Weather Blog

By CliffMass

This was a bad week for wind energy in the Northwest, but before I discuss this, let’s step back for a few minutes.

There is a lot of interest in renewable energy in the Pacific Northwest that could supplement our hydropower.   

With our northern latitude and extensive clouds for much of the year, solar energy can only make a small contribution.   

To illustrate, here is the annual solar energy map for the U.S.  Western Oregon and Washington have poor solar resources.  Better in eastern Oregon and the Columbia Basin.  But even in these areas, there is very little resource from November through February.

Annual solar energy map of the U.S., highlighting varying solar resources across different regions, with Western Oregon and Washington showing lower solar potential.

The wind energy situation in the Northwest is better, but not particularly good.   Consider the map of annual wind energy resources in the U.S. (below).   The windy High Plains of the U.S. have terrific potential, but the western U.S., away from the coast, has very modest wind energy, at best.  Only the coastal waters from central Oregon to central CA have good wind potential.

Map illustrating the annual wind energy resources across the United States, showing varying wind speeds and potential from different regions.

Here in Washington State, the only decent non-coastal area for wind energy is the eastern slopes of the Cascades (see map below).   That is why nearly all of the wind turbines are there.  Constructing wind turbines offshore is very expensive and has significant environmental problems.

Map showing wind power resource estimates in Washington State, indicating various wind power classes and potential across regions.

But there is a problem.   For much of the year, these turbines generate little power.

Consider the Bonneville Power Authority (BPA) statistics for the past week.   The total energy demand is the red line, and hydro generation is blue.

Wind energy (green) has been very small most of the week, except on one day (November 18) when a frontal system moved through.  The output from one nuclear plant (purple) has been constant and generally much higher.

A graph showing the BPA balancing authority load and generation statistics from November 16 to November 23, 2025, highlighting total energy load in red, variable energy resources in green, hydro generation in blue, fossil/biomass generation in brown, and nuclear generation in cobalt.

The truth is that wind generation in our region is only really significant from late spring to late summer, when strong westerly flow descends the eastern slopes of the Cascades.

To see this, consider the winds at Ellensburg, surrounded by wind turbines on several sides.  Good winds from April into the middle of August.  But consistently slower (and often very weak) the remainder of the year.

A line graph displaying wind speed in knots over time for Ellensburg, with data points ranging from December 2024 to October 2025. The graph shows peaks and troughs in wind speed, indicating seasonal variations.

In short, our region needs to maximize our hydro resources and invest in next-generation nuclear (fission) plants, which are inherently safe.

With rapidly increasing demand for electricity, expected to roughly double by mid-century (see NW Power Council estimate below), without new generation capacity, there is a near certainty of blackouts, particularly during cold periods. 

Line graph showing the projected peak demand range (MW) for Climate A from 2025 to 2046, with values increasing over time.


Discover more from Climate- Science.press

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.