Climate scientists reconsider the meaning and implications of drought in light of a changing world
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA – SANTA BARBARA
CREDIT: PUBLIC DOMAIN
Maps of the American West have featured ever darker shades of red over the past two decades. The colors illustrate the unprecedented drought blighting the region. In some areas, conditions have blown past severe and extreme drought into exceptional drought. But rather than add more superlatives to our descriptions, one group of scientists believes it’s time to reconsider the very definition of drought.
Researchers from half a dozen universities investigated what the future might hold in terms of rainfall and soil moisture, two measurements of drought. The team, led by UC Santa Barbara’s Samantha Stevenson, found that many regions of the world will enter permanent dry or wet conditions in the coming decades, under modern definitions. The findings, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reveal the importance of rethinking how we classify these events as well as how we respond to them.
“Essentially, we need to stop thinking about returning to normal as a thing that is possible,” said Stevenson, an assistant professor in the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. This idea affects both how we define drought and pluvial (abnormally wet) events and how we adapt to a changing environment.
A drought is when conditions are drier than expected. But this concept becomes vague when the baseline itself is in flux. Stevenson suggests that, for some applications, it’s more productive to frame drought relative to this changing background state, rather than a region’s historical range of water availability.
To predict future precipitation and soil moisture levels, Stevenson and her colleagues turned to a new collection of climate models from different research institutions. Researchers had run each model many times with slightly different initial conditions, in what scientists call an “ensemble.” Since the climate is an inherently chaotic system, researchers use ensembles to account for some of this unpredictability.
The results show a world where certain regions are in permanent drought while others experience perennial pluvial for the rest of the 21st century. The team calculated the year in which average soil moisture will exceed the threshold that defines either a megadrought or a megapluvial. “In other words, at what point do average conditions exceed what we would consider a megadrought if it happened now, [and never return to ‘normal’]” Stevenson said.
The western United States has already crossed this benchmark, and there are other places headed that way as well, including Australia, southern Africa and western Europe. “But, again, that’s if we use today’s definition of a drought,” Stevenson said.
The authors argue that we need to move away from fixed definitions toward a more nuanced account of drought and pluvial. “Our idea of normal is, in a sense, meaningless when ‘normal’ is continuously changing,” Stevenson added.
Climate models indicate that average soil moisture in many regions will continue to drop. That said, the team’s ensembles suggests that soil moisture will continue to experience drought-related variation similar to today, relative to the ever-drier baseline.
The fluctuation highlights the need to consider both long term changes and the usual ups and downs associated with historic droughts and pluvials. “The most important management challenge will be to adjust for the relentless declines in water availability, as this exceeds the expected impact of future megadroughts,” said co-author Julia Cole, a professor at the University of Michigan.
Precipitation patterns, on the other hand, will become much more extreme. Warm air holds more moisture than cold air. So as the atmosphere heats up, it’ll be able to suck more moisture from dry areas and dump more precipitation on wet regions.
“We wanted to consider both precipitation and soil moisture at the same time because that can be important for water management,” Stevenson said. For instance, we will need to adapt infrastructure to more arid conditions in the American West, but that infrastructure will also need to handle more intense rainfall.
“When we talk about being in a drought, the presumption is that eventually the drought will end, and conditions will return to normal,” Stevenson said. “But if we’re never returning to normal, then we need to adapt all of the ways that we manage water with the expectation that normal will continually be drier and drier every year.”
JOURNAL
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
ARTICLE TITLE
Twenty-first century hydroclimate: A continually changing baseline, with more frequent extremes
ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE
14-Mar-2022
1
A. P. Williams et al., Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368, 314–318 (2020).
2
D. L. Swain, B. Langenbrunner, J. D. Neelin, A. Hall, Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first-century California. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 427–433 (2018).
3
K. Hasselmann, Stochastic climate models. Part I: Theory. Tellus 28, 473–485 (1976).
4
C. Deser, L. Terray, A. S. Phillips, Forced and internal components of winter air temperature trends over North America during the past 50 years: Mechanisms and implications. J. Clim. 29, 2237–2258 (2016).
5
T. R. Ault, J. E. Cole, J. T. Overpeck, G. T. Pederson, D. M. Meko, Assessing the risk of persistent drought using climate model simulations and paleoclimate data. J. Clim. 27, 7529–7549 (2014).
6
F. Lehner et al., Partitioning climate projection uncertainty with multiple large ensembles and CMIP5/6. Earth Syst. Dyn. 11, 491–508 (2020).
7
C. Deser et al., Insights from earth system model initial-condition large ensembles and future prospects. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 277–286 (2020).
8
B. Cook et al., Twenty-first century drought projections in the CMIP6 forcing scenarios. Earths Futur. 8, e2019EF001461 (2020).
9
T. R. Ault, J. S. Mankin, B. I. Cook, J. E. Smerdon, Relative impacts of mitigation, temperature, and precipitation on 21st-century megadrought risk in the American Southwest. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600873 (2016).
10
J. S. Mankin et al., Blue water trade-offs with vegetation in a CO2-enriched climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3115–3125 (2018).
11
J. S. Mankin, R. Seager, J. E. Smerdon, B. I. Cook, A. P. Williams, Mid-latitude freshwater availability reduced by projected vegetation responses to climate change. Nat. Geosci. 12, 983–988 (2019).
12
J. Scheff, J. S. Mankin, S. Coats, H. Liu, CO2-plant effects do not account for the gap between dryness indices and projected dryness impacts in CMIP6 or CMIP5. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 034018 (2021).
13
B. I. Cook, T. R. Ault, J. E. Smerdon, Unprecedented 21st century drought risk in the American Southwest and central plains. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400082 (2015).
14
S. Pfahl, P. A. O’Gorman, E. M. Fischer, Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 423–427 (2017).
15
P. A. O’Gorman, T. Schneider, The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 14773–14777 (2009).
16
A. G. Pendergrass, D. L. Hartmann, Changes in the distribution of rain frequency and intensity in response to global warming. J. Clim. 27, 8372–8383 (2014).
17
Z. Hausfather, G. P. Peters, Emissions–The ‘business as usual’ story is misleading. Nature 577, 618–620 (2020).
18
M. Collins et al., “Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility” in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, T. Stocker et al., Eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013), pp. 1029–1136.
19
D. Touma, M. Ashfaq, M. A. Nayak, S. C. Kao, N. S. Diffenbaugh, A multi-model and multi-index evaluation of drought characteristics in the 21st century. J. Hydrol. (Amst.) 526, 196–207 (2015).
20
J. E. Tierney et al., Tropical sea surface temperatures for the past four centuries reconstructed from coral archives. Paleoceanography 30, 226–252 (2015).
21
S. Coats, J. S. Mankin, The challenge of accurately quantifying future megadrought risk in the American Southwest. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 9225–9233 (2016).
22
E. Hanak, J. Lund, Adapting California’s water management to climate change. Clim. Change 111, 17–44 (2012).
23
F. Lehner et al., Projected drought risk in 1.5C and 2C warmer climates. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 7419–7428 (2017).
24
P. C. D. Milly, K. A. Dunne, Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science 367, 1252–1255 (2020).
25
F. Giorgi, X. Bi, Time of emergence (TOE) of GHG-forced precipitation change hot-spots. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L06709 (2009).
26
E. Hawkins, R. Sutton, Time of emergence of climate signals. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L01702 (2012).
27
J. T. Abatzoglou, A. P. Williams, R. Barbero, Global emergence of anthropogenic climate change in fire weather indices. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 326–336 (2019).
28
A. Dai, R. M. Rasmussen, C. Liu, K. Ikeda, A. F. Prein, A new mechanism for warm-season precipitation response to global warming based on convection-permitting simulations. Clim. Dyn. 55, 343–368 (2020).
29
S. Zhou et al., Land-atmosphere feedbacks exacerbate concurrent soil drought and atmospheric aridity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 18848–18853 (2019).
30
M. G. Donat, A. L. Lowry, L. V. Alexander, P. A. O’Gorman, N. Maher, More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 508–513 (2016).
31
B. Pohl, C. Macron, P. A. Monerie, Fewer rainy days and more extreme rainfall by the end of the century in Southern Africa. Sci. Rep. 7, 46466 (2017).
32
K. E. Trenberth, A. Dai, R. M. Rasmussen, D. B. Parsons, The changing character of precipitation. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84, 1205–1218 (2003).
33
A. M. Ukkola, M. G. De Kauwe, M. L. Roderick, G. Abramowitz, A. J. Pitman, Robust future changes in meteorological drought in CMIP6 projections despite uncertainty in precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL087820 (2020).
34
J. E. Kay et al., The community earth system model (CESM) large ensemble project: A community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 96, 1333–1349 (2015).
35
H. Shi, C. Wang, Projected 21st century changes in snow water equivalent over northern hemisphere landmasses from the CMIP5 model ensemble. Cryosphere 9, 1943–1953 (2015).
36
A. L. S. Swann, F. M. Hoffman, C. D. Koven, J. T. Randerson, Plant responses to increasing CO2 reduce estimates of climate impacts on drought severity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 10019–10024 (2016).
37
T. B. Richardson et al., Carbon dioxide physiological forcing dominates projected Eastern Amazonian drying. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 2815–2825 (2018).
38
B. Langenbrunner, M. Pritchard, G. J. Kooperman, J. T. Randerson, Why does Amazon precipitation decrease when tropical forests respond to increasing CO2? Earths Futur. 7, 450–468 (2019).
39
T. R. Ault et al., The continuum of hydroclimate variability in western North America during the last millennium. J. Clim. 26, 5863–5878 (2013).
40
S. M. Vicente-Serrano et al., Evidence of increasing drought severity caused by temperature rise in southern Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 044001 (2014).
41
B. Udall, J. T. Overpeck, The twenty-first century Colorado River hot drought and implications for the future. Water Resour. Res. 53, 2404–2418 (2017).
42
F. Lehner, C. Deser, L. Terray, Toward a new estimate of ‘time of emergence’ of anthropogenic warming: Insights from dynamical adjustment and a large initial-condition model ensemble. J. Clim. 30, 7739–7756 (2017).
43
P. C. D. Milly et al., Climate change. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319, 573–574 (2008).
44
F. Lehner et al., The potential to reduce uncertainty in regional runoff projections from climate models. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 926–933 (2019).
45
S. Coats, B. I. Cook, J. E. Smerdon, R. Seager, North American pancontinental droughts in model simulations of the last millennium. J. Clim. 28, 2025–2043 (2015).
46
S. Stevenson et al., Climate variability, volcanic forcing, and last millennium hydroclimate extremes. J. Clim. 31, 4309–4327 (2018).
47
R. Seager et al., Strengthening tropical Pacific zonal sea surface temperature gradient consistent with rising greenhouse gases. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 517–522 (2019).
48
S. Power et al., Decadal climate variability in the tropical Pacific: Characteristics, causes, predictability, and prospects. Science 374, eaay9165 (2021).
49
S. Sippel et al., Quantifying changes in climate variability and extremes: Pitfalls and their overcoming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 9990–9998 (2015).
via Watts Up With That?
March 15, 2022
You must be logged in to post a comment.