“As far as I am concerned, you, Fauci, and the rest of the “Fear Mongers”, are the greatest danger the USA and the World faces!” – Marcus __________
Fauci, I want my life back!
Marcus
“Every day we are in danger from something, but that’s life! And, Fauci, I want my life back! I want to do what ever I want, when I want, and I am sure most others want this too!”
What did I hear on the radio? Good old Fauci spouting that we need to wear masks even after we get the virus shot. Yes, Fauci! You know the one of the many that researched ways of mutating animal viruses that will infect humans until Obama banned it, then continued the research at the Wuhan lab. Yeah, that guy!
Wear a mask or two he preaches, for there are variants of the virus out there. There’s two in New York, and two in California as well as in Africa.
What are we to do, hide in the basement? No, I can’t hide in the basement or the Earthquake might kill me.
Hide in a closet? No, for a tornado or hurricane might kill me!
Stand outside? No, lightening might strike me!
Heck, I can’t even cross the street in a crosswalk without taking my life in my hands!
Every day we are in danger from something, but that’s life! And, Fauci, I want my life back! I want to do what ever I want, when I want, and I am sure most others want this too!
I won’t forget that Fauci developed the road map for the Chinese Wuhan Lab to create a viral weapon!
How many other viral weapons could be created thanks to your research?
As far as I am concerned, you, Fauci, and the rest of the “Fear Mongers”, are the greatest danger the USA and the World faces! They should put your face in the post office along with the other criminals!
We just looked at snow cover over the northern hemisphere for the first day of spring, and instead we see winter is still very much in action. The rapid global warming seems to be taking its time getting here as winter lingers on.
Today we take a look at February data from far northern Europe countries. First we look at the stations in Sweden for which the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) has sufficient data going back to 1988:
Four of the 5 stations examined show February mean temperatures cooling or remaining stable, suggesting winters are ending earlier and earlier.
Finland
Moving east to Finland, we look at the mean February temperature from JMA data from 6 stations: In a warming world, mid winter should also be warming, right?
The northernmost stations in Finland have been showing modest cooling since 1988, while the warmer locations have shown slight warming. Taken altogether, there’s been no real trend change in Finland over the past 3 decades.
Nothing alarming is happening in Finland.
Norway
Next we examine the JMA February data for Norway, the Scandinavian country located next to the far north Atlantic, so possibly a good indicator of North Atlantic trends:
Norwegian trends are a mixed bag: some stations are showing robust warming, while others show modest cooling. Here it’s opposite of Finland: the cold stations have warmed, while the warmer ones have cooled off a bit.
Ireland
Finally we look at the JMA February data for Ireland:
In Ireland, 2 of the 6 examined stations have shown warming since 1988, but so statistically insignificant that we can say it’s meaningless. Overall, Ireland February temperatures have cooled or remained almost steady over the past 33 years.
In summary the stations for which the JMA has sufficient data across northern Europe tell us that winters are not moderating like global warming models and media warned they would.
There are a lot of great books out there on why there is skepticism about climate, simply from a scientific point of view. This is not only warranted by the very nature of science itself, which is to question, but makes effective counters to the settled science ideas.
The debate over the drivers of climate should be a scientific one, not agenda driven.
But alas, it is not that way today. As usual, and this ALWAYS COMES FROM LEFTIST THINKING, someone found some way to exploit something to try to push a top down agenda that seeks control of individuals and conformity to a group think mentality. It turns into a matter of the relative truths of people that wish to control, vs the absolute truths of Nature and Natures God. While doomsday predictions have been with us since the start of time, its only now they have journeyed from a supernatural cause that involved religion, to a man-made cause that has been made in a way into a religion. Ironic isn’t it? They either deny God is in control, deny God, or say this is what God wants you to do. You can’t make this up.
One of the most amazing side issues here is that the people pushing this advocate for population control by various methods, and then turn around and tell people they are doing it because of concern with future generations. Providing they actually get born.
Phony? Fraud? Fill in your own word. No matter what, it comes out to deception, which is a tool of evil.
But I want to make sure that because I am not mentioning certain books here, that people understand how great those books are.
When I wrote The Weaponization of Weather in the Phony Climate War, I had no idea Marc was writing this book. I used the word “Phony” because it is a Phony War on 2 fronts. 1) That any person would think they are some kind of warrior that is going to save the planet, is an exercise in ego, arrogance and ignorance. They actually think they are in a combat situation where someone in the act of defending their country, gets killed or maimed? Or even sees or hear of it. Just the act of commitment is beyond anything a bunch of wannabe warriors can even fathom, unless they have been to war. I have not been. My wrestling coach at PSU was one of the first men on the beach in Normandy. He knew what was, I did not. Hence the Satiric cover
2) Its phony because it simply uses climate and weather to push an agenda that in and of itself is phony. Marc calls it fraud. One of the phony aspects is the idea that this leftist Utopia is actually progressive, leading to the advancement of man. Its opposite, it leads to the enslavement of man. 2) And this is why Marcs Book has me overjoyed at its writing and release, it exposes the phoniness (fraud) of a Green new deal, which is neither geared toward Green and is nothing but a raw deal. And the way it is being pushed on people is emblematic of a tyranny that grows more harsh by the day.
On this matter in a figurative sense, I feel like John the Baptist with my book, and its content preparing the way for Marc’s book. Check out the chapter list for instance:
I call Marc the Godfather, because like me, his name ends in a vowel, and don’t throw in the towel when it comes to things we believe to be true. But in terms of really getting out there, Marc obviously is the man. Marc is a policy animal who knows and understands enough about climate and weather to put this together. The book not only wins, it wins big. And he makes the point that this is not about either climate or weather in the very title of the book. Think about this. The idea that the earth is now Greener than it has ever been in the satellite era, and the name of the left’s push is the Green New Deal? How is it Green in the first place if its advocating policies that arguably try to lessen the very element that is causing the greening, co2? Because it is not really about that. And Marc lays it all out in the book, exposing and destroying their missive. It’s the perfect end game, again none of us knew we were writing our books, but somehow all of them tie in so that reading Marc’s book is the natural peak to focus you on how deceptive this all is. I always try to avoid words like fraud in anything I do. But Marc is right. I think it is a phony “war”. There is no atmospheric Apocalypse coming (hence Michael Schellenberger’s title, Apocalypse Never). The very fact that people would label other people “deniers” of something that they use to improve their forecasts, understanding the variability of climate and weather inherent to the planet, should immediately raise red flags as to whether something is meant for truth or deception. Why would you say that about someone that has made a living using climate and its variability to help him with his forecasting? And why would you stop someone like Marc from using factually referenced items to weave his counters. If he is so wrong, you do not need to shut him up, his words will do it for you. And why do you make it a war?
The Chapter list is a great summary as to where a book is going to take you.
Marcs Chapters
The Green Raw Deal
A History: Every New Crisis has the Same “Solution”: Expanding the Size and Power of Government
Man-Made Climate Change is Not a Threat
The Details of the Deal
Europe is Already Enjoying Their Version of the Green New Deal and Its Not Going Well
The Green New Deal Plagiarizes the Same “Solutions” from Previous Environmental Scares
The Red New Deal? The Watermelon Cut Open
Even Many Environmentalists Are Bailing on the Green New Deal
The Costs to End All Costs
Energy Mandate Fairy Tale (Michael Moore Shocks the Greens)
The Covid-Climate Connection: Covid Lockdowns as a Dress Rehearsal for the “Climate Emergency”
Now this is where our books intersect directly ( Remember Marc is more policy and result oriented, I am more supply evidence for why the weather proves our point). But you can see it Chapter 10 and 11 in my book:
Exploiting the Children. (side note, I am shocked at the terror k-9 is instilling in our children. That is one thing that motivated me to write a second book)
Identity Politics Invades the Climate Debate
The Toxic Politics of the Green New Deal
The Ultimate Achievement of the Political Left
How Serious is Marc? There are over 90 pages of Notes, a must when we have a media that won’t look at anything. The natural counter to Deception is referenced fact.
So it comes down to this. Are you serious about looking into this issue? Then Green Fraud is a must. The most the left does with me or Marc or anyone that dares disagree is find some kind of sound bite they can rip. They have no idea on what we really know because they assume we know nothing. Comes with the arrogance and ignorance inherent in agendas like this. Well, those who think they know what they know, don’t yet know what they ought to know. So for me, I go and read what people that oppose me are saying, so I can see where they are coming from. I do not fear discussion. If you want the weather counter, the spiritual and political idea behind this, linkage to Covid, and a solution, then mine gets in there. But more important and dare I say, the most important of the bunch, is what Marc has just put out. Its researched, and he nails this. There are over 300 pages chock full of information you need to know. The references themselves are worth reading over, so you can see what the Godfather has been doing to make this a book you can not refuse. Look at that chapter list. My brief review can not do justice to the volume of information Marc has come up with. You will always have it there for you, ready to reference if called upon to explain the truth on this matter. Some of the leaders in this country that are supposedly trying to stop this steamroller would do well to make sure they had it ready to use. But it is up to you. So make sure you get your hands on this.
Its crazy isn’t it? Can you believe all this? But perhaps we were made for a time such as this. Marc’s book is. It’s a book if you are really serious, you cant refuse.
The condition of Brewarrina is hardly better than that of Bourke. Yesterday’s record was 117. On Wednesday night many of the residents walked the streets for hours, the thermometer at midnight registered 109, and the minimum reading was 103. Sickness is alarmingly prevalent. Bingara was yesterday visited by a terrific thunderstorm. Typhoid is prevalent in this district. Burraga yesterday registered 100 ; Cobar, 119, with two deaths registered. Goulburn, 104, with five deaths ; Grafton, 100 ; Gundagai, 108 ; Harden, 103; Moree, 109 ; Tamworth, 101. Wagga, 110 ; West Wyalong, 114 ; Young, 108.
This is a rather excellent review of the new book by Mark Carney, which shows just how dangerous an individual he really is:
Humanity faces huge challenges, from climate change to inequality, the pandemic to AI. Mark Carney, the former Bank of England governor, says that tackling any of them requires an urgent prerequisite: rethinking “value”.
In his new 608-page book, Carney laments the economic consensus that “value is subjective”. This pillar of economics says that the value of goods, such as cars, are determined not by their gadgets or the labour producing them but by individuals’ judgments of the car’s importance in meeting our own needs. You may highly value having a convertible roof for summer; I do not. But my decision to buy a simpler car for, say, £20,000, shows that I value that car by at least that much. Value, then, is in the eye of the beholder.
In each case, voluntary trade makes both buyer and seller better off – each side giving up something they consider of lesser value (me, the money; the seller, the car). So, to create value through exchange, market trades should be left unhindered, except when obvious market failures arise that governments must act upon.
According to Carney, however, our “marketised society”, governed by this principle, corrupts society’s “values”, because it blurs the distinction between market prices and “social value”. Price is conflated with value, such that everything unpriced is seen as non-valuable. Amazon, the company, has a $1.5 trillion equity valuation. The biodiversity of the Amazon rainforest appears on no ledger until it is converted to farm land.
We therefore need to move away from “unfettered capitalism”, he says, to an economic model where, rather than pursuing our own subjective interests, society forges “consensus” on its objectives based on our “shared values”. Markets can then be “marshalled to help discover and drive solutions in a form of mission-oriented capitalism”. So we might call “sustainability” our value and make mitigating climate change an objective. Capitalism should be harnessed to deliver that goal.
Mark Carney’s anti-market rhetoric in Value(s) is catnip to a Davos-attending technocratic elite CREDIT: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg
In many ways, Carney is attacking a straw man here. Nobody thinks an absence of prices suggests something is not valuable. I value my parents, even though I can’t trade them. People volunteering to sew PPE, or help the NHS during Covid-19, does not reflect the limitations of a market system in harnessing social value, as Carney claims; merely that we are also willing to engage in non-market activities in return for rewards other than money, such as self-esteem.
Carney’s anti-market rhetoric, though, is catnip to a Davos-attending technocratic elite, who bemoan “unfettered capitalism” (despite the fact that, as regulators, lobbyists and beneficiaries of cronyism, they are doing a pretty good job of fettering the supposed laissez-faire consensus).
Ultimately, when he suggests that we place too much faith in the wisdom of markets and their prices, what he is really saying is that individuals have too much decision‑making power and that greater power should be transferred to worthies to decide what is best for us. But who makes those decisions, and how, in a world where we disagree profusely is something Carney never really addresses.
The truth is that markets are good at deliberating these tensions. They allow our differences to be traded off, and minority views served. Non‑market collective decisions, however, are inevitably made via forms of politics in business or government, with all their clashes of values, corruption and tribalism. Carney brushes this off as harmonious “consensus”, but in reality, they are often bitter contests for monopoly power.
On cue, Carney unveils his list of values that he thinks should drive individuals, business and governments: “solidarity,” “fairness,” “responsibility,” “resilience,” “sustainability,” “dynamism,” and “humility.” Conspicuously absent is “freedom”. But a bigger vacuum is any explanation of how these values would be traded off in his brave new world. Governments deciding to give unemployed workers more taxpayer money might reflect “solidarity”, yet it undermines “dynamism”. Making society-wide decisions is riddled with such thorny trade‑offs. Take the pandemic. Carney correctly observes that, as a society, we undervalued resilience before the pandemic. Our failure to learn from East Asian experiences with Sars and Mers cost thousands of lives and, so far, 12 months of living – impacts that could have been mitigated through tiny prior public health investments.
Yet our failure in preparation here wasn’t due to markets’ corrupting influence, but politicians spurning public health to prioritise public services, welfare and pensions. Why? Because politicians get rewarded for spending today and providing relief when crises hit; not for unseen investments to protect against emergencies perceived as unlikely. Yet Carney would have politics play an even bigger role in our lives.
On cue, Carney unveils his list of values that he thinks should drive individuals, business and governments: “solidarity,” “fairness,” “responsibility,” “resilience,” “sustainability,” “dynamism,” and “humility.” Conspicuously absent is “freedom”
Many more government failures, in fact, were down to the very “values” Carney wants us to enshrine. If medical regulators had allowed a market in human challenge trials sooner – with individuals offered money for deliberate Covid-19 infection in controlled environments, allowing rapid vaccine efficacy assessments – the pandemic could be over now. How many lives were sacrificed because of a politically enforced “value” that said it was unethical to deliberately infect someone, even if they personally accepted the risk-reward trade-off of infection, and their bravery brought massive social benefits?
Carney likewise says that policymakers were right not to use formal cost-benefit analyses to weigh up the impact of lockdowns on the economy, health, and civil liberties – a technocratic method which puts a notional value on deaths avoided. Instead, he says, society expressed a “values” preference for minimising deaths through blanket social distancing regulations. From that, he says, it follows that government’s primary objective was to minimise deaths – and only then think about delivering it in the least costly way. Yet in his Reith Lecture, Carney said “due respect” should also be given to “inequality, mental health and other social consequences”. That sounds an awful lot like weighing up trade-offs, but with Carney’s own judgment determining the priority.
And that’s the recurring problem with this book. Carney outlines his own policy preferences – for rapid decarbonisation, stakeholder capitalism, more diversity, more government investment, and other progressive goals – as if they reflected objective, universally held values. He likewise downplays the trade-offs inevitably required when allocating resources or determining priorities. The green agenda is described as “win-win-win” for all – with no acknowledgement of the massive transition costs to a low-carbon economy. Businesses are told that embracing stakeholder capitalism will make them more profitable, but also that solely pursuing profits will undermine social value. This is the profit variant of “this food is disgusting and the portions are too small”.
When reading this dense – often muddled – book, which touches on everything from Bitcoin to climate change in extraordinary detail, I couldn’t help wondering whether Carney’s central argument was less a principled objection to our “marketised society”, more a tirade of frustration that our current freely made economic and political choices do not conform to the preferences of Mark Carney.
Above all, this book reveals that it was never about the climate. All along, Carney and the rest of the Davos elite have wanted to change society to conform to what they think it should be like.
Nary a day goes by without an outrageous claim about climate in the media.
These over-the-top, outrageous assertions are not science. They are talking points spoon-fed by radical pressure groups to an all-too-compliant media. They are often made up on the spot.
Just this week Marc Morano posted the facts that debunk media claims that “summer droughts in Europe are now ‘far more severe’ than anything in the past 2,100 years due to climate.” Climate analyst Paul Homewood explained that scientific data shows nothing of the sort. In fact two recent papers, that went through the sacred peer review process, reveal first that Europe has had “no significant linear trends in either seasonal or annual rainfall. The second concludes that summer rainfall has increased since 1961.” These studies rely on real world recorded data for the Czech Republic in contrast to the computer simulations reported in the press.
These stories have a common tell. Watch out for superlatives such as hottest, coldest, wettest, driest, snowiest, most, etc.
These kind of climate claims scream out for correction. They raise a passion for truth in those acquainted with the straight facts. CFACT, our Climate Depot news and information service, and a host of allied friends and organizations dedicate vast efforts to making these corrections. That’s why the climate-Left will do anything to besmirch and silence us.
The next time you hear an extreme climate claim modified by a superlative, check in at CFACT.org and Climate Depot where you’ll regularly find the hard data which powerfully debunks this sort of hype.
If the press won’t do it’s job, and vet extreme climate claims with hard-hitting analysis, we will.
But if they read their own newspaper, they would know that isn’t true.
In 1132 the earth opened, and the rivers and springs disappeared in Alsace. The Rhine was dried up. In 1152 the heat was so great that eggs were cooked in the sand. la 1160, at the battle of Bela. a great number of soldiers died from the heat. In 1276 and 1277, in France, there was an absolute failure of the crops of grass and oats. In 1303 and 1304, the Seine. the Loire, the Rhine, and the Danube, were passed over dry-footed.
IN 637 the heat was so great in France and Germany that all springs dried up, and water became so scarce that many people died of thirst.
In 873 work in the field had to be given up ; agricultural labourers persisting in their work were struck down in a few minutes, so powerful was the sun.
In 993 the sun’s rays were so fierce that vegetation burned up as under the action of fire.
In 1000 rivers ran dry under the protracted heat ; the fish were left dry in heaps, and putrified in a few hours. The stench that ensued produced the plague.
Men and animals venturing in the sun in the summer of 1022 fell down dying; the throat parched to a tinder and the blood rushed to the brain.
In 1132 not only did the rivers dry up but the ground cracked on every side, and became baked to the hardness of stone. The Rhine in Alsace nearly dried up.
Italy was visited with terrific heat in 1139; vegetations and plants were burned up.
During the battle of Bela, in 1260, there were more victims made by the sun than by weapons; men fell down sunstruck in regular rows.
In 1303 and 1304 the Rhine, Loire, and Seine ran dry.
Scotland suffered particularly in 1625; men and beasts die in scores.
The heat in several French departments during the summer of 1705 was equal to that in a glass furnace. Meat could be cooked by merely exposing it to the sun. Not a soul dared venture out between noon and 4 p.m.
In 1718 the thermometer rose to 118 deg.
In 1779 the heat at Bologna was so great that a great number of people was stifled. There was not sufficient air for the breath, and people had to take refuge under-ground.
In July, 1793, the heat became intolerable. Vegetables were burned up, and fruit dried upon the trees. The furniture and woodwork in dwelling-houses cracked and split up; meat went bad in an hour.
The rivers ran dry in several provinces during 1811; expedients had to be devised for the grinding of corn.
In 1822 a protracted heat was accompanied by storms and earthquakes; during the drought legions of mice overran Lorraine and Alsace, committing incalculable damage.
In 1832 the heat brought about cholera in France; 20,000 persons fell victims to the visitation in Paris alone.
In 1846 the thermometer marked 125 deg. in the sun.
Global warming, climate change, all these things are just a dream come true for politicians. I deal with evidence and not with frightening computer models because the seeker after truth does not put his faith in any consensus. The road to the truth is long and hard, but this is the road we must follow. People who describe the unprecedented comfort and ease of modern life as a climate disaster, in my opinion have no idea what a real problem is.
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. View more
Cookies settings
Accept
Privacy & Cookie policy
Privacy & Cookies policy
Cookies list
Cookie name
Active
Wer wir sind
Textvorschlag: Die Adresse unserer Website ist: https://climate-science.press.
Kommentare
Textvorschlag: Wenn Besucher Kommentare auf der Website schreiben, sammeln wir die Daten, die im Kommentar-Formular angezeigt werden, außerdem die IP-Adresse des Besuchers und den User-Agent-String (damit wird der Browser identifiziert), um die Erkennung von Spam zu unterstützen.
Aus deiner E-Mail-Adresse kann eine anonymisierte Zeichenfolge erstellt (auch Hash genannt) und dem Gravatar-Dienst übergeben werden, um zu prüfen, ob du diesen benutzt. Die Datenschutzerklärung des Gravatar-Dienstes findest du hier: https://automattic.com/privacy/. Nachdem dein Kommentar freigegeben wurde, ist dein Profilbild öffentlich im Kontext deines Kommentars sichtbar.
Medien
Textvorschlag: Wenn du ein registrierter Benutzer bist und Fotos auf diese Website lädst, solltest du vermeiden, Fotos mit einem EXIF-GPS-Standort hochzuladen. Besucher dieser Website könnten Fotos, die auf dieser Website gespeichert sind, herunterladen und deren Standort-Informationen extrahieren.
Cookies
Textvorschlag: Wenn du einen Kommentar auf unserer Website schreibst, kann das eine Einwilligung sein, deinen Namen, E-Mail-Adresse und Website in Cookies zu speichern. Dies ist eine Komfortfunktion, damit du nicht, wenn du einen weiteren Kommentar schreibst, all diese Daten erneut eingeben musst. Diese Cookies werden ein Jahr lang gespeichert.
Falls du ein Konto hast und dich auf dieser Website anmeldest, werden wir ein temporäres Cookie setzen, um festzustellen, ob dein Browser Cookies akzeptiert. Dieses Cookie enthält keine personenbezogenen Daten und wird verworfen, wenn du deinen Browser schließt.
Wenn du dich anmeldest, werden wir einige Cookies einrichten, um deine Anmeldeinformationen und Anzeigeoptionen zu speichern. Anmelde-Cookies verfallen nach zwei Tagen und Cookies für die Anzeigeoptionen nach einem Jahr. Falls du bei der Anmeldung „Angemeldet bleiben“ auswählst, wird deine Anmeldung zwei Wochen lang aufrechterhalten. Mit der Abmeldung aus deinem Konto werden die Anmelde-Cookies gelöscht.
Wenn du einen Artikel bearbeitest oder veröffentlichst, wird ein zusätzlicher Cookie in deinem Browser gespeichert. Dieser Cookie enthält keine personenbezogenen Daten und verweist nur auf die Beitrags-ID des Artikels, den du gerade bearbeitet hast. Der Cookie verfällt nach einem Tag.
Eingebettete Inhalte von anderen Websites
Textvorschlag: Beiträge auf dieser Website können eingebettete Inhalte beinhalten (z. B. Videos, Bilder, Beiträge etc.). Eingebettete Inhalte von anderen Websites verhalten sich exakt so, als ob der Besucher die andere Website besucht hätte.
Diese Websites können Daten über dich sammeln, Cookies benutzen, zusätzliche Tracking-Dienste von Dritten einbetten und deine Interaktion mit diesem eingebetteten Inhalt aufzeichnen, inklusive deiner Interaktion mit dem eingebetteten Inhalt, falls du ein Konto hast und auf dieser Website angemeldet bist.
Mit wem wir deine Daten teilen
Textvorschlag: Wenn du eine Zurücksetzung des Passworts beantragst, wird deine IP-Adresse in der E-Mail zur Zurücksetzung enthalten sein.
Wie lange wir deine Daten speichern
Textvorschlag: Wenn du einen Kommentar schreibst, wird dieser inklusive Metadaten zeitlich unbegrenzt gespeichert. Auf diese Art können wir Folgekommentare automatisch erkennen und freigeben, anstatt sie in einer Moderations-Warteschlange festzuhalten.
Für Benutzer, die sich auf unserer Website registrieren, speichern wir zusätzlich die persönlichen Informationen, die sie in ihren Benutzerprofilen angeben. Alle Benutzer können jederzeit ihre persönlichen Informationen einsehen, verändern oder löschen (der Benutzername kann nicht verändert werden). Administratoren der Website können diese Informationen ebenfalls einsehen und verändern.
Welche Rechte du an deinen Daten hast
Textvorschlag: Wenn du ein Konto auf dieser Website besitzt oder Kommentare geschrieben hast, kannst du einen Export deiner personenbezogenen Daten bei uns anfordern, inklusive aller Daten, die du uns mitgeteilt hast. Darüber hinaus kannst du die Löschung aller personenbezogenen Daten, die wir von dir gespeichert haben, anfordern. Dies umfasst nicht die Daten, die wir aufgrund administrativer, rechtlicher oder sicherheitsrelevanter Notwendigkeiten aufbewahren müssen.
Wohin deine Daten gesendet werden
Textvorschlag: Besucher-Kommentare könnten von einem automatisierten Dienst zur Spam-Erkennung untersucht werden.
