Network Rail Blame Climate Change For Stonehaven Tragedy

By Paul Homewood

Network Rail’s interim report into the Stonehaven crash has just been published:

image

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/action-taken-to-improve-resilience-of-railway-following-stonehaven-tragedy

While not exactly blaming it on climate change, the message is loud and clear :

image
image

As we shall go on to see, they present little evidence that this is the case.

But first to the accident itself. We learn that50mm of rain fell in the area that day:

image

As I noted at the time, falls of 50mm are not an unusual event in that part of Scotland, such as Dyce in Aberdeen.

pgdcnUKE00105881

Rainfall across Eastern Scotland averaged out at 14.79mm that day, an insignificant amount in comparison to historical data.

time series

https://climexp.knmi.nl/getindices.cgi?WMO=UKMOData/HadESP_daily_qc&STATION=E_Scotland&TYPE=p&id=someone@somewhere&NPERYEAR=366

It is abundantly clear therefore that the weather that day was far from unprecedented, and should not have overwhelmed Network Rail’s safety systems.

The report then goes on to purport to show that an increasing number of earthwork failures is connected to higher monthly rainfall since 2003, when proper records began to be kept on failures.

image

However, look closely and you will see that the top graph is not actual rainfall, but the percentage of the long term average. Quite what relevance this has, I have not got a clue. Clearly it is the AMOUNT of rain which causes problems, not the ANOMALY!

Clearly the chart is intended to mislead, by exaggerating rainfall in February 2020, which, although a record for the month, was not particularly high in comparison with all months.

image

https://climexp.knmi.nl/getindices.cgi?WMO=UKMOData/HadEWP_monthly_qc&STATION=England-Wales&TYPE=p&id=someone@somewhere

When we plug in the actual rainfall data, Feb 2020 is no higher than several other months since 2003, and the rainfall clearly cannot explain the sharp spike in earthwork failures. This is not to say that rainfall is not the key factor, which it clearly is; simply that failures were far fewer in earlier years with similar or more rainfall.

image
image

On the following page, there is a table, which tends to contradict the chart. It confirms that there has been no trend at all in earthwork failures until this year.

image

Section 4 deals with climate change, but the only evidence for their claim comes from GIGO climate modelling and attribution studies:

image

Of course, the actual data does not support their assertions. For instance drier summers:

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/maps-and-data/uk-temperature-rainfall-and-sunshine-time-series

Or extreme rainfall:

image
image

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadukp/data/download.html

It would be shocking if the Network Rail were allowed to cover up their failings by blaming Stonehaven on climate change.

I’ll leave you with one final thought.

Network Rail was formed in 2002, since when, according to their graph, earthwork failures have become progressively worse. Some unkind observers might think the two things are connected!

SEPTEMBER 11, 2020

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/

Author: uwe.roland.gross

Don`t worry there is no significant man- made global warming. The global warming scare is not driven by science but driven by politics. Al Gore and the UN are dead wrong on climate fears. The IPCC process is a perversion of science.