Proof that NASA and NOAA are erasing the Arctic’s 1940s “warming blip”

Tony Heller’s website realclimatescience.com is a one-stop shop for exposing government agency data-fudging. For decades, NASA/NOAA have been cooling the past so as to create a fake warming trend — all in a desperate attempt to sustain their failing AGW theory. 761 weitere Wörter

Proof that NASA and NOAA are erasing the Arctic’s 1940s “warming blip” — Electroverse

Proof that NASA and NOAA are erasing the Arctic’s 1940s “warming blip”

Tony Heller’s website realclimatescience.com is a one-stop shop for exposing government agency data-fudging. For decades, NASA/NOAA have been cooling the past so as to create a fake warming trend — all in a desperate attempt to sustain their failing AGW theory.

Furthermore, and not to get too personal here, but why are the scientists at the heart of the fraud such slimy, thinned-skinned wusses–desperate to evade scrutiny at all costs? What do they have to hide?

Case in point, watch this embarrassing interview with NASA’s Gavin Schmidt and the excellent Dr Roy Spencer. Schmidt only agreed to speak if it “wasn’t a debate”. And while I urge you watch the entire video, particularly the parts with the Spencer (a real climate scientist btw), skip to 2:00 and then to 6:30 if you’re interested in Schmidt’s “la la la, I’m not listening to you” evading tactics.


So NASA refuses to debate an issue which supposedly negatively impacts every living organism on the planet — and 2013 should be considered the good old days. Now, the climate fraudsters have worked a position where so-called skeptics have no platform at all. Today, even this kind of non-debate would never be agreed to.

But looking at the ever-mounting case against NASA/NOAA re their temperature graphs, they probably have good reason to evade scrutiny.

Serving as just one example, government agencies have been erasing the 1940s warmth in the Eastern Arctic for decades, writes Tony Heller.

This is what the raw data for Iceland’s capital Reykjavík looks like:

[Measured – NASA]


And this is what the data looks like after NASA made its adjustments:

[NASA link removed]


Note the tactic — cool the past in order to fabricate a warming trend where there was none before:

A comparison [NASA link removed]


Removing the warmth of the 1940s (without any justification) was discussed by the world’s leading climate experts in this Climategate email:


Those at the Icelandic Met Office (IMO) couldn’t understand the adjustments.

Trausti Jónsson, senior meteorologist at the IMO, wrote in 2012 that his office was never advised as to the reason for them.

Furthermore, Jónsson said the temperature corrections “are grossly in error in the case of Reykjavík…” And when asked if the IMO intended to modify its data to match that of NASA’s/NOAA’s, Jónsson replied: “no”.

Years later, Jónsson suspiciously flipped his story, going from “the corrections are grossly in error” to “the adjustments are quite sound” — and no explanation for this change of heart was given.

And just as suspiciously, after the heat that followed NASA’s Icelandic temperature tampering debacle, Schmidt and his band of merry frauds quietly stopped adjusting Reykjavík’s data, without comment — thus confirming the removal of the 1940s warmth was without justification.

Temperature adjustments aren’t just confined to the Eastern Arctic, of course.

Government book-cooking encompasses the entire globe.

Back in 1999, NASA clearly showed that there was no net global warming from 1866 to 1976, and that 1877 was the warmest year during that interval:

Archived version linked here.


Note that this looks nothing like Michael Mann’s infamous hockey stick blade, where Mann shows roughly 0.4C net warming from 1866 to 1976:


This, again, deserves explanation.

NASA/NOAA, again, give none.

Don’t fall for warm-mongering political agendas riding on the back of fraudulent data. Particularly when the real science suggests the exact opposite is occurring — the COLD TIMES are likely returning in line with historically low solar activitycloud-nucleating Cosmic Rays, and a meridional jet stream flow.

Even NASA appear to agree, if you read between the lines, with their forecast for this upcoming solar cycle (25) seeing it as “the weakest of the past 200 years,” with the agency correlating previous solar shutdowns to prolonged periods of global cooling here.


Prepare accordingly — learn the facts, relocate if need be, and grow your own.

Social Media channels are restricting Electroverse’s reach; Twitter are purging followers, and Facebook are labeling posts as “false” — be sure to subscribe to receive new post notifications by email (the box is located in the sidebar >>> or scroll down if on mobile).

And/or become a Patron, by clicking here: patreon.com/join/electroverse

The site receives ZERO funding, and never has.

Any way you can, help us spread the message so others can survive and thrive in the coming times.

Grand Solar Minimum + Pole Shift

Another Climate Scientist with Impeccable Credentials Breaks Ranks: “Our models are Mickey-Mouse Mockeries of the Real World”

https://electroverse.net/another-climate-scientist-with-impeccable-credentials-breaks-ranks/embed/#?secret=TMCgacY70w

The post Proof that NASA and NOAA are erasing the Arctic’s 1940s “warming blip” appeared first on Electroverse.

Author: uwe.roland.gross

Don`t worry there is no significant man- made global warming. The global warming scare is not driven by science but driven by politics. Al Gore and the UN are dead wrong on climate fears. The IPCC process is a perversion of science.