Answer to a whigmaleerie about temperature feedback

Iowa Climate Science Education

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

Some days ago, a prolix, inspissate whigmaleerie was posted here ? a gaseous halation, an unwholesome effluvium, an interminable and obscurantist expatiation purporting to cast doubt upon my team?s conclusion that official climatology has misdefined and misapplied feedback and has thus made a mountain out of a molehill, approximately tripling the true midrange rate of global warming we can expect our sins of emission to engender.

clip_image002clip_image002

We define emission temperature R as the 255 K global mean surface temperature that would obtain on Earth at today?s solar irradiance and albedo but before any greenhouse gases have entered the atmosphere and before any feedback begins to operate; B as the feedback response in Kelvin to R; E, the sum of R and B, as the equilibrium temperature that would prevail after feedback has responded to emission temperature; ?R as the 10 K…

View original post 490 more words

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s